Apr 26, 2024  
2018 - 2019 Graduate Catalog 
    
2018 - 2019 Graduate Catalog [ARCHIVED CATALOG]

Educational Policy, Planning & Leadership (EPPL)


Degree Programs in Educational Policy, Planning, & Leadership (EPPL)  

 

 

 

 


Masters Degree Programs

The Master’s Degree program in Educational Leadership blends elements of well-grounded theoretical perspectives with innovative practices in the preparation of educational leaders for entry-level positions in educational organizations. The program offers two concentrations: PK-12 Administration & Supervision and Higher Education Administration.

Doctoral Degree Programs

For those students who already hold a master’s degree, we offer two options for advanced study:

  • Our Executive Ed.D. is designed for the working practitioner.
  • Our Ph.D. programs are intended for students interested in scholarly practice, research and/or teaching at the university level.

The Educational Policy, Planning and Leadership doctoral programs have the following components:

  • Program Area Core Course Requirements
  • Research Methodology courses (PhD) or Research Inquiry Courses (Executive Ed.D)
  • Concentration Options
  • Dissertation

Concentration Area

The purpose of the concentration is to enable the student to develop in-depth knowledge and understanding of principles, concepts, theories, and practices in a particular area of Educational Policy, Planning and Leadership.  Each student will be required to declare a concentration during the admission process.

For the Executive Ed.D program, there are concentration in K-12 Administration, Higher Education, Gifted Education, and School Psychology.

For the Ph.D. program, there are concentrations in General Education Administration, Gifted Education Administration, Curriculum Leadership, or Higher Education Administration.

Core & Research/Inquiry Courses

Doctoral students admitted into the EPPL Executive Ed.D. and Ph.D. programs will be required to take their four core courses in an established sequence during the first two years of matriculation. Students in the Ph.D. programs will also take their four required research courses during this two-year time frame. Fulltime students may take their concentration and cognate electives simultaneously with these required courses. Part-time students may take their electives in the summers and after the completion of the introductory courses. An exception could be made, with the permission of the advisor, for EPPL General (K-12) students seeking administrative license, who could take the licensure sequence first, followed by the doctoral core and research sequence.  Students in the Executive Ed.D. program take three required inquiry courses.

EPPL Comprehensive Exams-PhD

Format

The EPPL Comprehensive Exam is a five-calendar-day take-home exam comprising two sections: a section that requires knowledge, synthesis, and/or application of topics addressed in the four EPPL core courses (EPPL 601, 602, 603, and 604), and an article critique that assesses knowledge of research design and methods gained in the required research or inquiry courses.

  1. In section one, students respond to a prompt based on topics and materials from the EPPL core curriculum. The focus is on integration and application of knowledge explored in the core courses (EPPL 601, 602, 603, and 604).
  2. In section two, students produce a methodological critique of a scholarly article chosen from a set provided by the faculty. Key to the assessment of this portion of the exam response is the sophistication of the student’s critique of the selected study’s design, suggestions for improvement, and explanations of all points and suggestions made. Prior knowledge of the content addressed in the selected article is not required to write a successful response to this section of the exam.
Policies

The following policies apply to preparing for and taking the EPPL comprehensive exam:

Eligibility

Doctoral students are eligible to take the comprehensive exam after successful completion of the required EPPL core and research/inquiry courses. The exam can be taken prior to completion of Ph.D. advanced-level research electives (e.g., EDUC 700 and EPPL 765). The student must be enrolled for at least one credit hour during the semester when he or she is taking the exam.

Timing

The comprehensive exam must be taken within one year of completing the required EPPL core and research/inquiry courses. The comprehensive exam must be passed within five years from the time that the student is admitted to doctoral study. 

Scheduling

The Office of Academic Programs schedules EPPL comprehensive examinations.  Students must file register to take the comprehensive exam. The deadline to register for fall comprehensive exams is August 1; the deadline to apply for spring comprehensive exams is December 1.

There is one opportunity during each fall and spring semester to take the exam, scheduled approximately 3 - 4 weeks after the semesters begin. The dates for EPPL comprehensive exams appear on the School of Education’s online Academic Calendar.

Preparation and Completion

Students may work together as well as on their own while preparing for the comprehensive exam. Students may consult with their advisors for resources provided by the program to assist with exam preparation.  During the exam period, however, all work must be done individually. Students have five days to respond to the exam’s items, under the auspices of the William & Mary Honor Code.  The exam may be written from any location that is convenient to the student.

Students writing comprehensive exams are permitted the use of any materials, but exam responses must not include work previously published or submitted for academic credit. Exam takers will be required to sign a statement certifying that all responses to comprehensive exam questions are original, unpublished, not previously submitted, and that the student had no assistance with content, writing, and/or editing during the exam period.

Evaluation

Each comprehensive exam will be read independently by two EPPL faculty members, with a third reader assigned if there is a discrepancy between the assessments of the first two readers. Exams will be evaluated using blind review and on a pass/fail/honors basis. A unanimous vote is required for an honors designation; a majority is necessary for pass or fail evaluations. The review of exam responses will be completed within three weeks from the last day of the exam period. The designated review committee chair will notify the EPPL department chair of the evaluation results. The department chair will then inform the Office of Academic Programs, which subsequently will notify the student.

If any part of the exam receives a “fail” evaluation, the designated committee chair will provide feedback to the student’s program advisor, including recommendations for addressing deficiencies. A second exam will be scheduled during the next exam period for the portion(s) of the exam that were failed.  If the student fails either section of the comprehensive exam twice, the student will be withdrawn from the program.

EPPL Comprehensive Exams-Executive Ed.D.

Format

The EPPL Comprehensive Exam is a take-home exam, requiring knowledge, synthesis, and/or application of topics addressed in the four EPPL core courses (EPPL 601, 602, 603, and 604) and the research/inquiry sequence.

The Comprehensive Exam is designed to cover policy, planning and leadership theory in the EPPL program. Students will approach the response through the lens of their topic of interest and/or specialization area. The exam is designed in such a way as to further support the student in the development of a dissertation of practice research proposal. Further guidance will be available in the form of a set of criteria.

Overview:

  • Identification and description of a specific educational problem,
  • Synthesis and critique of appropriate literature relevant to that problem and its significance,
  • Framing of potential research questions and an approach to examining the problem,
  • Describing the implications for equity and excellence of this proposed research,
  • Describing the policy, planning and leadership implications of this proposed research, and
  • Use of clear, concise, doctoral level academic prose. 

The problem, presented as a researchable issue, may be contextual or one that serves as an example of a larger issue facing institutions, regionally or nationally that promises to offer greater understanding to scholars and practitioners.

Students will be given a time frame in which to respond that begins in the semester following completion of the core and research/inquiry sequence and concludes at the latest by the end of the same semester. Responses will be 18-20 pages in length, excluding references.

Policies

The following policies apply only to students in the Executive Ed.D. Program preparing for and taking the EPPL comprehensive exam:

Eligibility

Doctoral students in the Executive EdD Program are eligible to take the comprehensive exam after successful completion of the required EPPL core and research/inquiry courses. The student must be enrolled for at least one credit hour during the semester when he or she is taking the exam.

Timing

 The comprehensive exam must be taken within one year of completing the required EPPL core and research/inquiry courses. The comprehensive exam must be passed within five years from the time that the student is admitted to doctoral study. 

Scheduling

 The Committee will schedule the comprehensive exam during the semester following the student’s successful completion of all core and inquiry sequence course work. Students must file an application online with the School of Education Graduate Registrar to take the exam when they complete all required doctoral core and inquiry sequence course work. This form will be completed as part of advisement activities during the semester before the comprehensive exam window opens. The exam window runs from September 1 through November 30 in the Fall semester and February 1 through April 30 in the Spring semester. Students may not proceed with the Research Seminar II coursework until they have successfully completed the Comprehensive Examination.

Preparation and Completion 

Students may work together as well as on their own while preparing resources for the comprehensive exam. Students may consult with their advisors for resources provided by the program to assist with exam preparation.  During the exam period, however, all work must be done individually and independently. The examination window will be from September through November in the Fall semester and February through April in the Spring semester with specific deadlines possibly determined by the student’s committee. Students will respond to the exam’s items under the auspices of the William & Mary Honor Code.  The exam may be completed from any location that is convenient to the student.

Students writing comprehensive exams are permitted the use of any resources and may build upon their own, original work in prior courses, such as logic models and action research cycles, but exam responses must not include work previously published. Exam takers will be required to sign a statement certifying that all responses to comprehensive exam questions are original and that the student had no unauthorized assistance with content, writing, and/or editing during the exam period.

Evaluation

Each comprehensive exam will be read independently by the members of the individual student’s dissertation committee. Exams will be evaluated using a rubric and on a pass/fail/honors basis. A unanimous vote is required for an honors designation and for pass or fail evaluations. The committee will review exam responses within three weeks from the last day of the exam period. The committee chair will notify the EPPL department chair of the evaluation results. The department chair will then inform the Office of Academic Programs, which subsequently will send official notification the student.

If any part of the exam receives a “fail” evaluation, the designated committee chair will provide general feedback to the student, including recommendations for addressing deficiencies. Students will be given one opportunity to revise and resubmit the examination during the next examination window. If the student fails the comprehensive exam twice, the student will be withdrawn from the program.